libel, defamation and privacy

libel, defamation and privacy
   Defamation (collectively, libel and slander) actions to protect reputations often provoke incessant tabloid newspaper interest, despite the fact that it is often these newspapers who are the defendants in such actions. In a demonstration of the increasingly litigious nature of the British, such actions are indicative of the continual struggle to erect barriers between the ‘public’ and the ‘private’ personality, and question the limits of concepts such as ‘celebrity’ status. In an era where there appears to be an insatiable desire to discover minutiae of detail concerning people in the public eye, there has been widespread debate concerning how far a person’s private life can be interrogated. With no recognizable legal concept of a right to privacy, those suffering such an interrogation have little recourse to control the actions of writers and photographers. The problem has become even more pronounced as the tabloid press, in their worst excesses, try to achieve scoops at any cost; and their jobs are often made easier by the ready availability of ‘high-tech’ means of obtaining information. It is unsurprising that when serious mistakes are made in stories, the response of victims is often to sue for damage to their reputations. High-profile defamation cases have been brought by a number of television and sporting personalities such as Elton John and Ian Botham. Ironically, John’s success against the Sun newspaper allowed it to create a front-page story featuring its apology to the singer. Alongside this legal and media ‘circus’, there has been a long-standing debate regarding the extent of damages awarded by juries; unlike most civil actions, libel trials are generally still heard by juries. Throughout the late 1980s and early 1990s, initial large awards such as one million pounds to Elton John contributed to the Court of Appeal indicating that judges ought to advise juries on the appropriate level of compensation. The tightening of control was extended when the Court of Appeal was itself given power to substitute its own award when the original is deemed excessive. The debate over the right to personal privacy has largely been in response to revelations concerning the personal lives of the Royal family, particularly the Duchess of York. This has led to a number of calls for legislation in this area, and has brought into sharp focus the divergence of the UK from other jurisdictions such as France.
   See also: democracy; privacy
   Further reading
    Duncan, C. (1978) Defamation, London: Butterworth.

Encyclopedia of contemporary British culture . . 2014.

Игры ⚽ Нужно решить контрольную?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Defamation — This article is about the malicious statement. For the 2009 film, see Defamation (film). Libel and Slander redirect here. For other uses, see Libel (disambiguation) and Slander (disambiguation). Vilification and Calumny redirect here. For the… …   Wikipedia

  • Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom —    The CPBF was formed in 1979 as a broad based organization that campaigns for a democratic and accountable media. The term is widely defined including the traditional press and broadcast media but also extending to cable and satellite and newer …   Encyclopedia of contemporary British culture

  • official secrets and D-Notices —    Control of sensitive information relating to national security is governed by the Official Secrets Acts, the first of which was passed entirely in one Parliamentary day in 1911 in response to scare stories concerning German spies. Shortly… …   Encyclopedia of contemporary British culture

  • libel — /laybal/ A method of defamation expressed by print, writing, pictures, or signs. In its most general sense, any publication that is injurious to the reputation of another. A false and unprivileged publication in writing of defamatory material.… …   Black's law dictionary

  • libel — /laybal/ A method of defamation expressed by print, writing, pictures, or signs. In its most general sense, any publication that is injurious to the reputation of another. A false and unprivileged publication in writing of defamatory material.… …   Black's law dictionary

  • Privacy laws of the United States — United States privacy laws embody several different legal concepts. One is the invasion of privacy , a tort based in common law allowing an aggrieved party to bring a lawsuit against an individual who unlawfully intrudes into his or her private… …   Wikipedia

  • English defamation law — Modern libel and slander laws as implemented in many but not all Commonwealth nations, in the United States, and in the Republic of Ireland, are originally descended from English defamation law. The history of defamation law in England is… …   Wikipedia

  • Anti-Defamation League — For other uses, see Anti Defamation League (disambiguation). Anti Defamation League Logo of the Anti Defamation League Motto To stop the defamation of the Jewish people…to secure justice and fair treatment to all. Formatio …   Wikipedia

  • surveillance —    The balance of surveillance has shifted markedly in recent years from state to civil society. With the decline of the ‘cold war’, state surveillance has declined somewhat and is now lawfully restricted only to activities that have a subversive …   Encyclopedia of contemporary British culture

  • political correctness —    Although having a distinguished ancestry in the race relations and equal opportunities acts of the 1970s, the concern with political correctness can be traced to the American academic community of the mid 1980s. Its advocates argue that… …   Encyclopedia of contemporary British culture

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”